The Front Office Has a Stake in T+1 Readiness

By Daniel Carpenter, CEO of Meritsoft, a Cognizant company

Standfirst: T+1 will be an operations team priority but there’s something in it for the front office

Europe has set 11 October 2027 as the day it moves to T+1 with the EU, UK and Switzerland all moving in Tandem. But with 14 clearing houses and 32 central securities depositories that all need to be coordinated, it will not be an easy task.

For many firms, budget allocation and plans to upgrade systems have already begun. This will allow 2026 to be used as a year to implement new systems and software and where 2027 can be focused on testing, final preparations and gaining operational benefits in advance of the deadline.

Responsibility for this market moving event lies primarily with the operations team and other back office functions to be prepared. In this industry, the unfortunate reality often sees back office upgrades falling to the wayside, as demands from the revenue generating front office take precedent.

But there are major costs that inevitably hit deal profitability, associated with addressing T+1 manually, which should make the front office sit up and take notice.

For processes that could not be automated, either because of time or budget, staff numbers were increased as T+1 went live in the US in May 2024. A survey published in September 2024 by Citi found that 44% of firms were significantly impacted by increased headcount in the middle and back office. Half of companies indicated that securities lending and funding/margining were also severely increased due to the shortened settlement cycle.

These challenges can lead to lost revenue due to the likes of early stock recalls or holding more cash to meet funding requirements. Settlement fails also incur costs from interest claims of trade counterparties and – in the EU – regulatory penalties from CSDR.

Improving settlement efficiency is not just about being ready for T+1, it will also enable the wider business to find and unlock capital efficiencies.

Known unknowns

It is hard to fully quantify the losses caused by settlement fails. They are known unknowns. Without the transparency created by centralising all the relevant data, firms have a poor view of how fails affect their wider trading operations.

A better overview using granular data from in-house systems, custodians, CSDs and trade counterparties will help predict which firms might be more prone to fail at certain times or for specific types of securities.

This level of transparency will enable firms to make more strategic decisions, for example, on their stock lending and recall activities, which will be key given the expectation that settlement fails will increase under T+1.

The front office needs to be much more cognizant that if a trade fails there is a cost to that, through the added expense of stock borrowing or penalties for the fail to both the counterparty and the regulator.

Optimising post-trade

In the quest for better capital efficiency, firms have focused on what the front office knows, pre-trade. Regulation has meant best execution has been relentlessly pursued. Traders select the venue with the best price, using the right order type and trade at the correct time of day, tapping into multiple data streams to ensure best execution.

T+1 can help jump start the conversation that many post-trade processes remain unoptimised and that there are efficiencies to be realised.

While there is plenty of data to make sure a trader is getting the best bid/offer, less attention is being paid to how fails can influence the balance sheet. The data exists to alert a front office trader that there could be added costs to a trade by predicting when fails may occur. Historical trends can help inform future settlement fail risk – that information just needs to be captured and analysed.

As firms continue to squeeze more efficiency out of pre-trade, there are still plenty of areas left in post-trade where a central repository of settlement data can drive capital efficiency for the entire business.

Getting ready for T+1 may seem like an exercise of regulatory compliance, but there’s something in it for the front office as well.